Trying to get back into the swing of things after the post-Gibson's throat infection - tired and fatigued, but itching to get that camera in hand. Went up tonight to go take some photographs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b7d8/3b7d8f89a52e6cb9450989bb8ba00c29685a28f5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b411/4b41107837d604bf1ab65ff9358f59a51eb74566" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b444/5b444331f8afc7f52fdf413f878f2c37f057f511" alt=""
I think at ISO 100 they came out a lot sharper but the ISO 100 on the Nikon has less definition and has to be pumped up a bit in post. The Nikon ISO 100 is actually a base ISO 200 underexposed by 1 stop to simulate ISO 100, but unfortunately, the highlights tend to clip earlier and the sensor is less sensitive. I wanted to shoot at LO 1.0 because I still found that when I was shooting at night that if there was definition like clouds, there would be noise. So thus I went to LO 1.0 to remove what noise that was there. These images I shot in JPG. The next bunch I'll do in RAW.
No comments:
Post a Comment